One might think that this all happened on purpose but if I were to post that I'd be labeled a "Right Wing Conspiracist who watches Fox News." Okay maybe so, but then ask yourself this, "How come this also happened during the Parkland shooting." And in both instances the shooter was a known risk, and nothing was done to intervene. Of course, the ends justify the means body count be damned.
Mar 22, 2023·edited Mar 22, 2023Liked by Lee Williams
After thinking about the situations for a while, one would have to be foolhardy to NOT think it was more than just teens gone crazy. Using the 'Logic' of the Left, following all the trails of influence for both events, it definitely WAS more than just the teens. There were myriad examples of interaction with authority for both of them but little to nothing was done to prevent these abominations.
One of the major reasons we have paid for formal law enforcement agencies from the top to the bottom of our 'government' is to prevent things like this from happening.
This fully avoidable tragedy as well as the one in Parkland and many others are symptoms of the failure of not just LEOs but all the way up their chain of command - all the way to the Command In Chief.
Oh, BTW - by 'avoidable' I mean that if the 'authorities' HAD been doing their jobs correctly, neither of these teens would have gotten to the point where they would even think of doing what they did.
If only the police should have ARs but they are still terrified to use them to protect civilians, then why exactly do they need them? Unless of course the reason has nothing to do with public safety...
I'm pretty sure Arthur meant that "If the police are the only ones that should be allowed to have ARs..." there is a valid question about the police needing them at all. That would apply even more to M16s.
Rabbit holes be damned. The gauntlet has been laid down by PROVEN COWARDS, derelict in their duty and admitting on the record that they lacked the COURAGE to save women and children. In one case, the dead teacher was married to that cop outside in the hall who kept checking his phone for 77 minutes. At least one more had children lying on the floor bleeding to death. I am not interested in their excuses for their cowardice AT ALL. I doubt any one of them will show up to take my AR-15 or yours. Comprende?
Mar 22, 2023·edited Mar 22, 2023Liked by Lee Williams
P.S. I'm WAY more concerned about what that mom who fought the cops "establishing the perimeter" to go into that school unarmed...TWICE...to get her own kids thinks.
You have to love all those SBRs that are super effective for CQB. The only thing missing was a set of balls and tactics to take one shooter with no training. The Ignoramus Squad
Reminds me of an old joke...updated: Uvalde P.D. announces a bargain on AR15 rifles. Never fired and only dropped once while retreating.
LOL!
One might think that this all happened on purpose but if I were to post that I'd be labeled a "Right Wing Conspiracist who watches Fox News." Okay maybe so, but then ask yourself this, "How come this also happened during the Parkland shooting." And in both instances the shooter was a known risk, and nothing was done to intervene. Of course, the ends justify the means body count be damned.
After thinking about the situations for a while, one would have to be foolhardy to NOT think it was more than just teens gone crazy. Using the 'Logic' of the Left, following all the trails of influence for both events, it definitely WAS more than just the teens. There were myriad examples of interaction with authority for both of them but little to nothing was done to prevent these abominations.
One of the major reasons we have paid for formal law enforcement agencies from the top to the bottom of our 'government' is to prevent things like this from happening.
This fully avoidable tragedy as well as the one in Parkland and many others are symptoms of the failure of not just LEOs but all the way up their chain of command - all the way to the Command In Chief.
Oh, BTW - by 'avoidable' I mean that if the 'authorities' HAD been doing their jobs correctly, neither of these teens would have gotten to the point where they would even think of doing what they did.
If only the police should have ARs but they are still terrified to use them to protect civilians, then why exactly do they need them? Unless of course the reason has nothing to do with public safety...
Perhaps it's for "public intimidation".
If only the police have ARs? If I'm not mistaken, they can actually they can acquire M16s because they are LEO.
I'm pretty sure Arthur meant that "If the police are the only ones that should be allowed to have ARs..." there is a valid question about the police needing them at all. That would apply even more to M16s.
Mike, my point was that some LEO can purchase a select-fire using their Dept letterhead. But, yes rereading his post I see that now.
M16's are out. M4 with burst fire is the current iteration.
Can them ALL!!!!!
I wonder when they posed for that picture.
The fact they posed for that picture the way they did, exposes them as the charlatans they actually are.
Operator Camp?
More like Clown Camp ...
Live action fantasy camp.
Rabbit holes be damned. The gauntlet has been laid down by PROVEN COWARDS, derelict in their duty and admitting on the record that they lacked the COURAGE to save women and children. In one case, the dead teacher was married to that cop outside in the hall who kept checking his phone for 77 minutes. At least one more had children lying on the floor bleeding to death. I am not interested in their excuses for their cowardice AT ALL. I doubt any one of them will show up to take my AR-15 or yours. Comprende?
P.S. I'm WAY more concerned about what that mom who fought the cops "establishing the perimeter" to go into that school unarmed...TWICE...to get her own kids thinks.
Barney Fife would be proud of these losers.
You have to love all those SBRs that are super effective for CQB. The only thing missing was a set of balls and tactics to take one shooter with no training. The Ignoramus Squad