Clueless Santa Bryant’s time would be much better spent running roughshod over his elves,manufacturing toys, and getting them delivered to deserving children in time for Christmas. No wonder we have a supply chain problem…
And of these many mass shootings did they provide any insight into how many of the guilty were dumb enough to use a gun which they purchased from a legal gun dealer. Or for that matter have any of the fear mungers provided information on the utility of gun serial numbers in traceing gun purchasers to gun violence purpatrators.
GVA, CNN and basically all of MSM engage in widely distributed malfeasance in attempts to maintain plausible deniability. They could be useful idiots but they're complicit in the deceit.
Hundreds and thousands, if not millions, of co-conspirators producing products available for citation that are indeed based on fact yet presented with intentional 'errors' that provide the inference that the users aren't actually dishonest, but were misled by someone else, they're victims.
When personal and professional responsibility are ignored and no accountability is maintained, where is the expectation of even a hint of social order?
These are the people that destroy the fabric of nations. Ours included.
That isn't really "debunking" them, they are open about their definition which many media outlets use. The fact that they are a leftist group actually works against them if you use their definition because it captures most of the near daily gangland shootings that are almost exclusively black on black. The average low information normie thinks that most mass shootings are committed by White men, which is not true, so using the definition and data provided by the GVA puts people into a corner of explaining why over 600 mass shootings in the US get so little coverage: because the shooters are black and the guns are illegally possessed handguns, not scary AR-15s. We need to be smarter about countering their arguments, rather than demanding they use a different standard it is far more useful to use their own standard to undercut their argument.
Clueless Santa Bryant’s time would be much better spent running roughshod over his elves,manufacturing toys, and getting them delivered to deserving children in time for Christmas. No wonder we have a supply chain problem…
And of these many mass shootings did they provide any insight into how many of the guilty were dumb enough to use a gun which they purchased from a legal gun dealer. Or for that matter have any of the fear mungers provided information on the utility of gun serial numbers in traceing gun purchasers to gun violence purpatrators.
GVA, CNN and basically all of MSM engage in widely distributed malfeasance in attempts to maintain plausible deniability. They could be useful idiots but they're complicit in the deceit.
Hundreds and thousands, if not millions, of co-conspirators producing products available for citation that are indeed based on fact yet presented with intentional 'errors' that provide the inference that the users aren't actually dishonest, but were misled by someone else, they're victims.
When personal and professional responsibility are ignored and no accountability is maintained, where is the expectation of even a hint of social order?
These are the people that destroy the fabric of nations. Ours included.
That isn't really "debunking" them, they are open about their definition which many media outlets use. The fact that they are a leftist group actually works against them if you use their definition because it captures most of the near daily gangland shootings that are almost exclusively black on black. The average low information normie thinks that most mass shootings are committed by White men, which is not true, so using the definition and data provided by the GVA puts people into a corner of explaining why over 600 mass shootings in the US get so little coverage: because the shooters are black and the guns are illegally possessed handguns, not scary AR-15s. We need to be smarter about countering their arguments, rather than demanding they use a different standard it is far more useful to use their own standard to undercut their argument.