"Open Carry" prevents zealous LE from arresting Concealed Carry citizens for inadvertent or "printing" disclosure of an otherwise concealed handgun.
Also Open Carry is still seldom seen on a daily basis in GA. but sure can send a message as it did in Richmond, VA during the reign of the former democRat gubernor when thousands of armed citizens converged on the capittol.
"New law restores our gun rights to the Framers' original intent."
Welllllll, sort of. But - isn't that doing the same thing that Gov Gruesome was doing? Mis-characterizing the bill, but in a different direction.
3rd:
Here’s a list of disqualifying criteria for a CWFL:
...
Failing to provide proof of proficiency with a firearm.
...
This would be better with a more detailed explanation. I hadn't seen that before, myself.
4th, and back to this again:
What is constitutional carry?
Whether it’s called unlicensed, permitless or constitutional carry, these laws restore our gun rights to what the framers had in mind when they wrote the Second Amendment.
CLOSE, but NOT what the framers had in mind - by a longshot.
Let's not play into the hands of the anti-gunners by using the same tactics they do, even if it's for our own benefit. That really puts us in a bad light. I think it's referred to as 'steel-manning' an argument, but I sometimes get those mixed up with others.
"Open Carry" prevents zealous LE from arresting Concealed Carry citizens for inadvertent or "printing" disclosure of an otherwise concealed handgun.
Also Open Carry is still seldom seen on a daily basis in GA. but sure can send a message as it did in Richmond, VA during the reign of the former democRat gubernor when thousands of armed citizens converged on the capittol.
First off - THANKS! for the update Lee!
2nd:
"New law restores our gun rights to the Framers' original intent."
Welllllll, sort of. But - isn't that doing the same thing that Gov Gruesome was doing? Mis-characterizing the bill, but in a different direction.
3rd:
Here’s a list of disqualifying criteria for a CWFL:
...
Failing to provide proof of proficiency with a firearm.
...
This would be better with a more detailed explanation. I hadn't seen that before, myself.
4th, and back to this again:
What is constitutional carry?
Whether it’s called unlicensed, permitless or constitutional carry, these laws restore our gun rights to what the framers had in mind when they wrote the Second Amendment.
CLOSE, but NOT what the framers had in mind - by a longshot.
Let's not play into the hands of the anti-gunners by using the same tactics they do, even if it's for our own benefit. That really puts us in a bad light. I think it's referred to as 'steel-manning' an argument, but I sometimes get those mixed up with others.