9 Comments
founding

There are a couple of basic guidelines, I believe, that should be followed before any new law is contemplated:

1) Is there a real, demonstrable problem?

2) Can a law address that problem?

3) Can one rigorously analyze the results of implementation of the law vis a vis it's raison d'etre?

4) I there a provision to rescind the law if it does not meet previously established criteria of performance?

This exercise ought to be observed before our betters pass any new law.

In the current case, I don't see that legislation meets any of the above tests. Ergo it is window dressing and ought not be considered.

Expand full comment

You would expect our Government to act like a good business? I think you are setting your expectations to high.

Expand full comment
founding

No, I wouldn't. Sad, isn't it?

Expand full comment

Yes it is. It appears that those that cannot make it in the real "business" world end up in government (some for life like our current President) and that is pretty scary!

Expand full comment

life != like

Expand full comment
founding

Meanwhile ... where is Florida Constitutional Carry and 2ndA. Sanctuary? What exactly do our legislators do aside from pass crap like "Church Carry" and then congratulate themselves on their "accomplishment". We can do better. We can be better.

Expand full comment

Church carry to my knowledge has not been signed into law yet

Expand full comment
founding

So they haven't even accomplished that???? God.

Expand full comment

Guess what boys and girls, I'm officially discharged. 😁. Now, let's start planning that armed protest we talked about...

Expand full comment